Footnote 2

In this conceptual cooperative, the entrepreneur becomes one of the workers. His work is specialized and his pay is special: he gets what is left over after the others get paid. This would be an extreme way for a democratic worker cooperative to decide to distribute its pay, but -- with extreme assumptions about the capacity and taste for "coordination" -- not out of reason.

It would, of course, be more descriptively valid with respect to modern American firms to describe them as cooperatives of capital suppliers, in which some (executives) have special functions and differentiated payoffs based on a combination of salaries and profit-shares -- but this refinement will be beyond the scope of this discussion. It would add nothing but complication, since, once again, at the point of bankruptcy this ownership structure becomes irrelevant anyway.